Arjun Suresh (talk | contribs) |
Arjun Suresh (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| − | <div class="fb-like" data-href="https://armi.in/NP,_NP_Complete,_NP_Hard" data-layout="standard" data-action="like" data-show-faces="true" data-share="true"></div> | + | <div class="fb-like" data-href="https://armi.in/w/NP,_NP_Complete,_NP_Hard" data-layout="standard" data-action="like" data-show-faces="true" data-share="true"></div> |
| − | <div class="fb-comments" style="overflow: auto;width: 100%;" data-href="https://armi.in/NP,_NP_Complete,_NP_Hard" data-numposts="5" data-colorscheme="light"></div> | + | <div class="fb-comments" style="overflow: auto;width: 100%;" data-href="https://armi.in/w/NP,_NP_Complete,_NP_Hard" data-numposts="5" data-colorscheme="light"></div> |
[[Category: Algorithms & Data Structures]] | [[Category: Algorithms & Data Structures]] | ||
It might be because of the name but many graduate students find it difficult to understand <math>NP</math> problems. So, I thought of explaining them in an easy way. (When explanation becomes simple, some points may be lost. So, please do refer standard text books for more information)
As the name says these problems can be solved in polynomial time, i.e.; <math>O(n)</math>, <math>O(n^2)</math> or <math>O(n^k)</math>, where <math>k</math> is a constant.
Some think <math>NP</math> as Non-Polynomial. But actually its Non-deterministic Polynomial time. i.e.; these problems can be solved in polynomial time by a non-deterministic Turing machine and hence in exponential time by a deterministic Turing machine. In other words these problems can be verified (if a solution is given, say if its correct or wrong) in polynomial time. Examples include all P problems. One example of a problem not in <math>P</math> but in <math>NP</math> is Integer Factorization.
Over the years many problems in <math>NP</math> have been proved to be in <math>P</math> (like Primality Testing). Still, there are many problems in <math>NP</math> not proved to be in <math>P</math>. i.e.; the question still remains whether <math>P = NP</math> (i.e.; whether all <math>NP</math> problems are actually <math>P</math> problems).
<math>NP</math> Complete Problems helps in solving the above question. They are a subset of <math>NP</math> problems with the property that all other <math>NP</math> problems can be reduced to any of them in polynomial time. So, they are the hardest problems in <math>NP</math>, in terms of running time. Also, if anyone can show that an <math>NP</math> Complete Problem is in <math>P</math>, then all problems in <math>NP</math> will be in <math>P</math>, and hence <math>P = NP = NPC</math>.
All <math>NP</math> Complete problems are in <math>NP</math> because of the definition. Examples of <math>NP</math> Complete problems
These problems need not have any bound on their running time. If any <math>NP</math> Complete Problem is polynomial time reducable to a problem, that problem belongs to <math>NP</math> Hard class. Hence, all <math>NP</math> Complete problems are also <math>NP</math> Hard. In other words if a <math>NP</math> Hard problem is non-deterministic polynomial time solvable, its a <math>NP</math> Complete problem. Example of a <math>NP</math> Hard problem that's not <math>NP</math> Complete is Halting Problem.
--Arjun (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
It might be because of the name but many graduate students find it difficult to understand <math>NP</math> problems. So, I thought of explaining them in an easy way. (When explanation becomes simple, some points may be lost. So, please do refer standard text books for more information)
As the name says these problems can be solved in polynomial time, i.e.; <math>O(n)</math>, <math>O(n^2)</math> or <math>O(n^k)</math>, where <math>k</math> is a constant.
Some think <math>NP</math> as Non-Polynomial. But actually its Non-deterministic Polynomial time. i.e.; these problems can be solved in polynomial time by a non-deterministic Turing machine and hence in exponential time by a deterministic Turing machine. In other words these problems can be verified (if a solution is given, say if its correct or wrong) in polynomial time. Examples include all P problems. One example of a problem not in <math>P</math> but in <math>NP</math> is Integer Factorization.
Over the years many problems in <math>NP</math> have been proved to be in <math>P</math> (like Primality Testing). Still, there are many problems in <math>NP</math> not proved to be in <math>P</math>. i.e.; the question still remains whether <math>P = NP</math> (i.e.; whether all <math>NP</math> problems are actually <math>P</math> problems).
<math>NP</math> Complete Problems helps in solving the above question. They are a subset of <math>NP</math> problems with the property that all other <math>NP</math> problems can be reduced to any of them in polynomial time. So, they are the hardest problems in <math>NP</math>, in terms of running time. Also, if anyone can show that an <math>NP</math> Complete Problem is in <math>P</math>, then all problems in <math>NP</math> will be in <math>P</math>, and hence <math>P = NP = NPC</math>.
All <math>NP</math> Complete problems are in <math>NP</math> because of the definition. Examples of <math>NP</math> Complete problems
These problems need not have any bound on their running time. If any <math>NP</math> Complete Problem is polynomial time reducable to a problem, that problem belongs to <math>NP</math> Hard class. Hence, all <math>NP</math> Complete problems are also <math>NP</math> Hard. In other words if a <math>NP</math> Hard problem is non-deterministic polynomial time solvable, its a <math>NP</math> Complete problem. Example of a <math>NP</math> Hard problem that's not <math>NP</math> Complete is Halting Problem.
--Arjun (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
GATECSE