Arjun Suresh (talk | contribs) |
Arjun Suresh (talk | contribs) |
||
(17 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Closure property is a helping to know | + | Closure property is a helping technique to know the class of the resulting language when we do an operation on two languages of the same class. That is, suppose <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math> belong to CFL and if CFL is closed under operation <math>\cup</math>, then <math>L_1 \cup L_2</math> will be a CFL. But if CFL is not closed under <math>\cap</math>, that doesn't mean <math>L_1 \cap L_2</math> won't be a CFL. For a class to be closed under an operation, it should hold true for all languages in that class. So, if a class is not closed under an operation, we cannot say anything about the class of the resulting language of the operation - it may or may not belong to the class of the operand languages. In short, '''closure property is applicable, only when a language is closed under an operation'''. |
Now, while applying closure property do remember the language hierarchy. | Now, while applying closure property do remember the language hierarchy. | ||
− | Regular <math>\subset</math> DCFL <math>\subset</math>CFL <math>\subset</math> REC <math>\subset</math> RE. | + | |
− | So, if CFL is closed under Union, and <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math> belong to CFL, then <math>L_1 | + | Regular <math>\subset</math> DCFL <math>\subset</math>CFL <math>\subset</math> REC <math>\subset</math> RE. |
+ | |||
+ | So, if CFL is closed under Union, and <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math> belong to CFL, then <math>L_1\cup L_2</math> will be a CFL. But '''<math>L_1 \cup L_2</math> can also be a regular language, which closure property can't tell'''. For this we need to see <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math>. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{alert|Please don't by heart this table. This is just to check your understanding and some of them are not required for GATE|alert-danger}} | ||
:{| class="wikitable" | :{| class="wikitable" | ||
− | |+ align="top"|Closure properties of language families | + | |+ align="top"|Closure properties of language families |
|- | |- | ||
! Operation | ! Operation | ||
Line 64: | Line 68: | ||
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | | | + | |<math>\epsilon</math>-free Homomorphism |
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
| {{No}} | | {{No}} | ||
Line 72: | Line 76: | ||
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |Substitution | + | |Substitution (<math>\epsilon</math>-free) |
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
| {{No}} | | {{No}} | ||
Line 103: | Line 107: | ||
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
| {{Yes}} | | {{Yes}} | ||
− | + | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
|} | |} | ||
Line 132: | Line 118: | ||
{{Template:FBD}} | {{Template:FBD}} | ||
− | [[Category: Automata Theory]] | + | [[Category: Automata Theory Notes]] |
− | |||
[[Category: Compact Notes for Reference of Understanding]] | [[Category: Compact Notes for Reference of Understanding]] |
Closure property is a helping technique to know the class of the resulting language when we do an operation on two languages of the same class. That is, suppose <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math> belong to CFL and if CFL is closed under operation <math>\cup</math>, then <math>L_1 \cup L_2</math> will be a CFL. But if CFL is not closed under <math>\cap</math>, that doesn't mean <math>L_1 \cap L_2</math> won't be a CFL. For a class to be closed under an operation, it should hold true for all languages in that class. So, if a class is not closed under an operation, we cannot say anything about the class of the resulting language of the operation - it may or may not belong to the class of the operand languages. In short, closure property is applicable, only when a language is closed under an operation.
Now, while applying closure property do remember the language hierarchy.
Regular <math>\subset</math> DCFL <math>\subset</math>CFL <math>\subset</math> REC <math>\subset</math> RE.
So, if CFL is closed under Union, and <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math> belong to CFL, then <math>L_1\cup L_2</math> will be a CFL. But <math>L_1 \cup L_2</math> can also be a regular language, which closure property can't tell. For this we need to see <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math>.
Operation | Regular | DCFL | CFL | CSL | Recursive | RE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Union | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Intersection | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Complement | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Concatenation | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Kleene star | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Homomorphism | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
<math>\epsilon</math>-free Homomorphism | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Substitution (<math>\epsilon</math>-free) | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Inverse Homomorphism | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Reverse | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Intersection with a regular language | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Closure property is a helping to know what will be the resulting language when we do an operation on two languages of the same class. That is, suppose <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math> belong to CFL and if CFL is closed under operation <math>\cup</math>, then <math>L_1 \union L_2</math> will be CFL. But if CFL is not closed under \intersection, that doesn't mean <math>L_1 \intersection L_2</math> won't be CFL. For a class to be closed under an operation, it should hold true for all languages in that class. So, if a class is not closed we cannot say anything about the result of the operation, it may or may not belong to that class. In short, closure property is useful, only when a language is closed under an operation.
Now, while applying closure property do remember the language hierarchy.
Regular <math>\subset</math> DCFL <math>\subset</math>CFL <math>\subset</math> REC <math>\subset</math> RE.
So, if CFL is closed under Union, and <math>L_1</math> and <math>L_2</math> belong to CFL, then <math>L_1 U L_2</math> will be CFL. But <math>L_1 U L_2</math> may also be regular, which closure property can't tell.
Operation | Regular | DCFL | CFL | CSL | Recursive | RE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Union | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Intersection | Yes | No | No | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Complement | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Concatenation | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Kleene star | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Homomorphism | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | Yes |
e-free Homomorphism | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Substitution | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
Inverse Homomorphism | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Reverse | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Intersection with a regular language | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |