Arjun Suresh (talk | contribs) |
Arjun Suresh (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*If <math>A</math> is reduced to <math>B</math>, <math>C</math> is reduced to <math>A</math> , <math>B \in NP </math> and $C \in$ NPC, then <math>A</math> $\in$ <math>NPC</math> | *If <math>A</math> is reduced to <math>B</math>, <math>C</math> is reduced to <math>A</math> , <math>B \in NP </math> and $C \in$ NPC, then <math>A</math> $\in$ <math>NPC</math> | ||
*If <math>A</math> is reduced to <math>B</math> and <math>B</math> $\in$ NPH, then <math>A</math> $\in$ <math>?</math> | *If <math>A</math> is reduced to <math>B</math> and <math>B</math> $\in$ NPH, then <math>A</math> $\in$ <math>?</math> | ||
− | Here we can't say anything about A. It can be as hard as NPH, or as simple as P | + | **Here we can't say anything about A. It can be as hard as NPH, or as simple as P |
Assume all reductions are done in polynomial time
$P \subseteq NP \subseteq NPC \subseteq NPH$
Consider problems $A$, $B$ and $C$
Assume all reductions are done in polynomial time
$P \subseteq NP \subseteq NPC \subseteq NPH$
Consider problems $A$, $B$ and $C$
Here we can't say anything about A. It can be as hard as NPH, or as simple as P