Arjun Suresh (talk | contribs) |
Arjun Suresh (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
*If <math>A</math> is reduced to <math>B</math> and <math>B</math> $\in$ NPH, then <math>A</math> $\in$ <math>?</math> | *If <math>A</math> is reduced to <math>B</math> and <math>B</math> $\in$ NPH, then <math>A</math> $\in$ <math>?</math> | ||
Here we can't say anything about A. It can be as hard as NPH, or as simple as P | Here we can't say anything about A. It can be as hard as NPH, or as simple as P | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | {{Template:FBD}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category: Automata Theory]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[Category:Notes & Ebooks for GATE Preparation]] |
Assume all reductions are done in polynomial time
$P \subseteq NP \subseteq NPC \subseteq NPH$
Consider problems $A$, $B$ and $C$
Here we can't say anything about A. It can be as hard as NPH, or as simple as P
Assume all reductions are done in polynomial time
$P \subseteq NP \subseteq NPC \subseteq NPH$
Consider problems $A$, $B$ and $C$
Here we can't say anything about A. It can be as hard as NPH, or as simple as P